The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The graph illustrates the amount of money of a country’s exports in the variety of fields from 2015 and 2016, while the table gives information about the proportion in transformation in each class or exports in the year of 2016 in comparison with 2015.
It can be seen that the earnings from petroleum products always brought back the most money, meanwhile the percentage of textiles saw the biggest change in values.
The money from exporting petroleum products was one-third as much as that in gems and jewellery and as three times as much as textiles in 2015, respectively 61, 42 and 25 billion dollars. After 1 years, both petroleum products and engineering goods reached the peak, at 72 billion dollars, while agricultural products and textiles saw an increase in the exporting value, there was a slight decline in the earnings from gems and jewellery.
During 2015 and 2016, despite both petroleum and engineering products reaching the highest point, the increase in the proportion of engineering goods was much more doubled in that of petroleum products. meanwhile, the alteration in the increase of textiles was more than three times as the percentage in the decrease of textiles, respectively 5,18% and 15,24%. The agricultural products experienced a slight rise, at 0,81%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- The inequality between rich and poor nations is now wider than it has ever been before What do you think are the main causes of this difference and what do you think can be done to reduce the gap 77
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
... doubled in that of petroleum products. meanwhile, the alteration in the increase of text...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2009569378 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89220103253 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497607655502 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4965844878 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.285714286 112.824112599 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191531335128 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892068376856 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103942684513 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131909978574 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114921396563 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.