The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities
The table illustrates the proportion of subway systems in six numerous cities (London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles).
Looking from the overall perspective, it is crystal clear that the oldest station was initiated in the heart of the England, and on the other hand, Los Angeles station was the latest. It can be seen that majority of passengers used both Paris and Tokyo subways.
To begin with, London station was built in 1863 and around 775 million passengers used it per the year. However, the latest stations were embarked in Kyoto and Los Angeles and moreover, only 45 and 50 million people preferred to use it in a single year. The underground railway in Tokyo was the busiest around 1927 people used it. Furthermore, 1191 passengers tend to use Paris subway that opened in 1900. The subway system in Washington DC (1976) merely established prior to the subway in Kyoto and 144 million fond to use it per year.
London had the longest route around 394 km and on the contrary Kyoto and Los Angeles had the shortest route (11 km and 28 km). However, the length of the route of Paris and Tokyo were more than 150 km.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-14 | nhatvynguyen711 | view | |
2023-05-26 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
2023-05-04 | tranhien862002 | 100 | view |
2023-05-03 | nltnhi2104 | 56 | view |
2023-03-04 | tragiang0606 | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 11
- With the development of technology and science some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot Why should we encourage the art area 67
- Pie chart IELTS Academic Task 1 Sample Essay 3 2014 Age Distribution in Asia
- The charts below shows the percentage is of students joining north west University 47
- the graph below shows the number of university graduates in canada from 1992 to 2007 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, moreover, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67821782178 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37733576111 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.947878936 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751988951669 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342459546559 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623425573863 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597184849483 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078217177165 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.