Are famous people treated unfairly by the media? Should they be given more privacy, or is the price of their fame an invasion into their private life?
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The debate on the unfair treatment of eminent personalities by the communication media is a profound one. While some people opine that they deserve good amount of privacy, others maintain that they ought to live with this intrusion in their daily life as a result of their prominence in the society. This essay will gingerly delineate both the views before putting forward my opinion.
On the one hand, known figures have a gigantic amount of fan following among the people. As a result of this, the media owns a great deal of responsibility on the shoulders to reveal their intrinsic information to the public. Additionally, there is an enormous degree of monetary aspect associated with reporting the day to day happenings pertaining to celebrities by the media agencies. For instance, it boosts their TRPs and viewership to advertise for generating revenue. Hence, the reporters do not shy away from breaching their personal lives.
On the other hand, famous people also carry the feelings of a normal human being. They too want to lead their life with flexibility and freedom. For example, they definitely do not entertain when the hordes of individuals or the journalists with microphone and cameras, try to trespass their liberty to roam around freely. Moreover, they dislike the fact that their private matters are being discussed shamelessly on the television screens without their consent.
However, considering both the opposite arguments, I strongly believe that prominent people must have the right to maintain privacy in their lives. Also, stringent laws must be formulated for anyone who try to come on the way of their basic freedom.
To recapitulate, irrefutably, there is not an iota of doubt that people desire to remain cognizant about the film-stars and other such personalities. Nevertheless, in my perspective, a clear line needs to be drawn in the way those details are brought out for their fans by the media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-20 | asmita acharya | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | vu_hieu2k5 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | manu_kaur113 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | manu_kaur113 | 73 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13291139241 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85645049065 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4997970774 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309476286276 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902985966593 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518002124569 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160420874058 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463176089832 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.