People can eat a wide range variety of food that can be grown in other areas. As a result, people eat more food produced in other regions than local food. Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
In today’s world of globalization, people now can buy food that is produced from other regions easily. For this reason, imported products are being consumed more than local products. From my point of view, I truly believe that there are some obvious advantages of this trend but its drawbacks are also undeniable and cannot be overlooked.
On the one hand, I concur that consuming food which is grown from many different places can have some main positive effects. Firstly, consumers will have a wide range of choices from many food manufacturers who can provide them a variety of food instead of seasonal products from local companies. Taking some of the Western countries as a prime example, with the cold and dry weather here, planting and harvesting coffee is simply impossible, however, people here still can enjoy coffee-related products that are imported from tropical countries like Vietnam. Secondly, buying products from other areas can also boost the foreign trade between the two regions not only in economic ways but also in cultural ways.
On the other hand, I am also convinced that imported food can sometimes be too expensive due to taxes and delivery fees, which often make it unaffordable for some people. Moreover, there are now so many unauthenticated imported products in the market whose quality is not guaranteed. Consuming this type of food can cause negative effects on people’s health. In addition, this biased consuming behavior can lead to undeveloped domestic food industry and thus, traditional products with their cultural value will gradually disappear.
In conclusion, while I agree that eating a wide variety of food manufactured from different regions can provide people with positive impacts, its disadvantages are also irrefutable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | TLan168 | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Huy Do | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Huy Do | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | thanh nguyen qc | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-27 | thaovuphuong19 | 78 | view |
- There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The quality of life in large cities is decreasing What could be the reasons behind this What measures can be taken to resolve this problem 78
- The world s natural resources such as oil forests and fresh water are being consumed at an ever increasing rate What are the dangers of the situation What can be done to solve the problems 78
- The availability of entertainment such as video games on handheld devices is harmful to the individual and to the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology Has this been a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...that consuming food which is grown from many different places can have some main positive effe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 304, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...l products from local companies. Taking some of the Western countries as a prime example, w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3085106383 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78475382765 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5957967529 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382704056564 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148706873889 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880569064058 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254962245153 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334178550384 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.