Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the past, people were more inclined towards working in the same organisation for their entire life. Today, different individuals have a varied opinion about work options. Some people prefer working for same company during their life, while others believe in switching their companies.
Firstly, nowadays some people work in the same organisation all their lives. They are mostly masters of their profession and have a great respect in the company. As a result they are always selected for promotions and prizes. Therefore, it is clear that the positions of these employees will increase during their professional careers. For example, a professor working for the same university and getting involved in similar researches would be preferred for bigger research works than those professors who have worked for many organisations in different positions.
On the other hand, there are people in the world who thinks that working in different organisations improves their personal lives. These people have an opportunity to learn new information by working in different companies. And at the same time these people can be called talented. They have a rich outlook and are able to comunicate quickly with others. They benefit greatly from working in various organisations. For instance, a programmer who knows a veriaty of programming languages well is more likely to work in large companies.
In conclusion, while working in the same company can lead to professional growth, working in different organisations can benefit personal life. Therefore, these days people are expected to choose changing organizations to life a prosperous life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 87 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | lethithuphuong | 87 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | huyenphuong1702 | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main export in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chat below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projection of 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to change'.
Suggestion: to change
...hese days people are expected to choose changing organizations to life a prosperous life...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88319315485 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545098039216 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4294864046 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.554414067272 0.244688304435 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186063203321 0.084324248473 221% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127037482052 0.0667982634062 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.375157526823 0.151304729494 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757107586212 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.