The bar chart below shows the results of a survay about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habbits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make coprarisons where relevant
The bar chart compares the percentage of coffee and tea buying and drinking habbits in five cities such as Sydney, Melbourme, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart in three categories in the last 4 weeks.
Overall, the percentage of people who went to a cafe for coffee and tea was higher than other categories while the percentage of buying fresh coffee was the lowest in the last 4 weeks.
To begin with, Sydney people's percentage was tallest with 44% while others were about 43%, under 35% and 38% in buying fresh coffee respectively in the last 4 weeks. This category percentage in Brisbane and Adelaide was the same and in Holbart it was more with about 4%. In other cities this category's percentage was aproximetely 44% and 43% respectively and it was the tallest.
To contrast, the percentages of buying instant coffee were less than the percentage of going to a cafe for coffee or tea in the last 4 weeks in all towns except Adelaide. In Sydney, Melbourme and Hobart the percentage of going to a cafe showed over 60% in the last 4 weeks while it was nearly 55% and 50% in Brisbane and Adelaide respectively. While the percentage of Brisbane and Holbart people had over 50% by buying instant coffee in last 4 weeks, other cities were under 50%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-01-31 | Ezozbek1027 | 67 | view |
- Some people agrue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others belive that it is better to try and improve such situation Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the results of a survay about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habbits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make coprarisons where relevant 67
- The bar chart below shows about the average children born per woman in 5 countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hree categories in the last 4 weeks. Overall, the percentage of people who we...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was the lowest in the last 4 weeks. To begin with, Sydney peoples percentage...
^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was the same and in Holbart it was more with about 4%. In other cities this cate...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...respectively and it was the tallest. To contrast, the percentages of buying i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69545454545 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57314082767 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418181818182 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.2790566777 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.125 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150949408222 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867216412285 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664301268257 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12638894429 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067719569715 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.