Some people said that modern technology has made shopping today easier, while others disagree. Discuss both view and give your own opinion
People have different views about whether online shopping has brought many benefits to human lives. While many argue that it is a positive development, I am more convinced that high-tech shopping has more downsides.
On the one hand, the convenience of shopping on the Internet is undeniable. Firstly, high-tech shopping saves a great deal of time, as no transportation is needed. For example, shoppers no longer find themselves caught in rush hours traffic congestion or waiting in long queue at supermarket checkouts. Those experiences have been superseded by a click of a mouse. Secondly, ordering goods online provides a grater diversity of products and users can easily compare prices, which traditional shopping may take them a long period of time to complete.
On the other hand, I side with those who advocate that shopping online may have some disadvantages. The first reason is that many of older generation are slow to adopt changes. Thus they are the victims of frauds, as there are no clear return and exchange policies. Another reason worth mentioning is that high-tech shopping cannot meet the demand of some customers who prefer see and touch goods that they buy. For example, some shoppers want to try on their clothes and shoes or to physically handle fruit or vegetables before purchasing.
In conclusion, while advances in technology have transformed and facilitated shopping in modern world, I would argue that it makes shopping harder and cannot replace physical stores
People have different views about whether online shopping has brought many benefits to human lives. While many argue that it is a positive development, I am more convinced that high-tech shopping has more downsides.
On the one hand, the convenience of shopping on the Internet is undeniable. Firstly, high-tech shopping saves a great deal of time, as no transportation is needed. For example, shoppers no longer find themselves caught in rush hours traffic congestion or waiting in long queue at supermarket checkouts. Those experiences have been superseded by a click of a mouse. Secondly, ordering goods online provides a grater diversity of products and users can easily compare prices, which traditional shopping may take them a long period of time to complete.
On the other hand, I side with those who advocate that shopping online may have some disadvantages. The first reason is that many of older generation are slow to adopt changes. Thus they are the victims of frauds, as there are no clear return and exchange policies. Another reason worth mentioning is that high-tech shopping cannot meet the demand of some customers who prefer see and touch goods that they buy. For example, some shoppers want to try on their clothes and shoes or to physically handle fruit or vegetables before purchasing.
In conclusion, while advances in technology have transformed and facilitated shopping in modern world, I would argue that it makes shopping harder and cannot replace physical stores.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | leanguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-14 | thanhtran1406 | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-14 | thanhtran1406 | 56 | view |
- Some people said that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 56
- 14 Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 78
- People say that it is a waste of time for high school students to learn literature such as novels and poems Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 61
- Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land Which solution is better 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...aditional shopping may take them a long period of time to complete. On the other hand, I s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r generation are slow to adopt changes. Thus they are the victims of frauds, as ther...
^^^^
Line 11, column 523, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...aditional shopping may take them a long period of time to complete. On the other hand, I s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...r generation are slow to adopt changes. Thus they are the victims of frauds, as ther...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2527.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 482.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24273858921 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79941335011 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.317427385892 0.561755894193 57% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 775.8 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5447434144 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.08 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.28 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148539242849 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466884541612 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479188103977 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972011240968 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386318590899 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.