Some people said that modern technology has made shopping today easier, while others disagree. Discuss both view and give your own opinion
People have different views about whether online shopping has brought many benefits to human lives. While many argue that it is a positive development, I am more convinced that high-tech shopping has more downsides.
On the one hand, the convenience of shopping on the Internet is undeniable. Firstly, high-tech shopping saves a great deal of time, as no transportation is needed. For example, shoppers no longer find themselves caught in rush hours traffic congestion or waiting in long queue at supermarket checkouts. Those experiences have been superseded by a click of a mouse. Secondly, ordering goods online provides a grater diversity of products and users can easily compare prices, which traditional shopping may take them a long periodto complete.
On the other hand, I side with those who advocate that shopping online may have some disadvantages. The first reason is that many of older generation are slow to adopt changes. Thus, they are the victims of frauds, as there are no clear return and exchange policies. Another reason worth mentioning is that high-tech shopping cannot meet the demand of some customers who prefer see and touch goods that they buy. For example, some shoppers want to try on their clothes and shoes or to physically handle fruit or vegetables before purchasing.
In conclusion, while advances in technology have transformed and facilitated shopping in modern world, I would argue that it makes shopping harder and cannot replace physical stores
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-15 | leanguyen | 89 | view |
| 2021-02-14 | thanhtran1406 | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-14 | thanhtran1406 | 56 | view |
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your own opinion 73
- sport 73
- 14 Cars damage the environment and their use is increasing Why How can this be controlled 78
- sports 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2731092437 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80395689722 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634453781513 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6972259242 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5384615385 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149210171818 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479197459211 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456682263314 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974222152179 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383133572466 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.