In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
It is claimed that the number of vehicles on the roads will be reduced in couple decades. Although the car is a comfortable and suitable type of transport for many people, I dare say that the pollution caused by it accompanied with high costs related to the ownership of a car will eventually reduce the number of cars.
To begin with, the usage of private transport is usually associated with comfortable travelling and the ability to move in any direction, such as the office in the city center or a gym. Many people value comfortable travelling across the town, which significantly increases the number of vehicles. Usually people drive on their own with no passengers inside their cars. For example, a manager may use a car to begin her day travelling alone to the gym in the morning and then to the office in the city center. However, working late hours creates opportunities for those travelling by cars in the evening; this may become the fastest way home in late hours.
Nonetheless, the detrimental effect of usage of private cars outweighs its benefits. The use of personal cars leads to an increase in the pollution level and traffic in large cities, which, in turn makes it uncomfortable to live for public. To be specific, the University of General Pollution published a study according to which the pollution level in cities with population over a million people increased by 32% for just last ten years. To counteract this tendency the Government increased the amount of funding for those plants creating environmentally friendly vehicles such as project «Green Electro Bus» in Moscow factory.
By the same token, the one may greatly reduce the costs associated with the ownership of personal auto, including insurance costs, petroleum and yearly maintenance of the car. To be specific, the National Community of Car Lovers calculated the amount of money needed to cover costs of driving a car and published the result in a public investigation. The results of their research clearly demonstrate that the real costs of ownership of a car are mostly invisible from the first look and in several times may exceed the price of the new car. For example, the new car may cost five thousand dollars, and the costs of maintenance could be as much as fifty per cent of the price per year. The practice of accurate cost accounting will eventually boost the tendency of reducing the number of cars on the road.
All in all, the ownership of an own car has both its positive and negative side effects. The car may act as a comfortable driving tool, but at the same time the excessive driving may foster the development of pollution in large cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today 76
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information Others think access to so much information creates problems Which view do you agree with 90
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 81
- Thousands of animals currently reside in zoos around the world Recently there has been much debate about the value of zoos in today s world Careful consideration of the facts reveals that zoos are unethical and should be closed First defenders of zoos say 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, then, for example, such as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 43.0788530466 39% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2204.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84395604396 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74933898808 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.0161656611 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.444444444 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2777777778 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185411586637 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634005406456 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442521285174 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103528128773 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053281370406 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.