Computers are now the basis of the modern world. They should therefore be introduced into classrooms, and their programs used for direct teaching purposes. However, dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is a fact that computers and technology are inevitable nowadays. For this reason, in order to be up-to-date, computers should be integrated in every-day classes. However, it is argued that computer-based learning could draw to some problems. In my opinion technology brings up huge advantages to the education system, although paper-based learning should not be entirely replaced.
Online teaching can be more engaging and interactive: platforms like Kahoot make lectures more fun and interesting, keeping students active. Through online quizzes and surveys, the teacher can have an immediate panoramic view of the level of understanding of the class and receive a more honest feedback. Furthermore, students seem to be more interested in lessons which involve videos showing examples.
Moreover, since the environment is one of the main concerns, taking notes on a laptop can save up tons of paper.
One the other hand, it has been shown that such a long exposure to blue-light screens can deteriorate the sight. In addition, some research points out that paper-based learning is more effective, especially when students have to read and memorize a considerate number of pages.
I myself experienced one of the disadvantages of typing instead of handwriting; in any text editor a spelling checker is abled, which is a very useful service for preventing mistakes. However, I noticed I struggle at correctly spell all the words without any text replacement function.
In conclusion, digital whiteboards, projector and laptops are a resourceful commodity with a lot of potential. Yet, in order to not be disruptive, it has to go along with a more traditional way of teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-16 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-12 | quytnee | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | smiley | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | Jerryfsc | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-25 | sonicmaster | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, moreover, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36090225564 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13018635149 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9582295938 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.857142857 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1194044415 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400984903852 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427358724493 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0456261220947 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490202838526 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.