In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Fresh ideas or experience, which is more important? The prompt claims that important contributions in any field are more likely to be made by a beginner than an expert. I mostly disagree with this statement as new ideas and experience are equally important for the success of a field. To support my view, I will provide three reasons.
Firstly, a person becomes an expert from their experiences. Experience is nothing but a collection of mistakes. The expert has made and learned from these mistakes. For example, let's take the field of mathematics. Suppose a novice wants to publish a research paper on a project he has done. He might think that going to many conferences or talking to several publishers might increase his chances of getting his thesis published. An expert knows that this is not the case. All the conferences are not worth the money or time they demand. She knows which publisher has more reputation and better reach. Even if the novice's paper had better ideas but those ideas may not contribute to the field because they did not reach the correct audience. Hence, here expert's experience was more helpful for the field than the beginner's ideas.
Secondly. while it is true that new and innovative ideas are important. Due to working in the same field for so many years, the experienced experts might have some defined work structure which they might be reluctant to change. On the other hand, the novice may want to try something new, sometimes these new things might work out better. But, it is also true that these unused and untested ideas might cause undue harm. Because of the better understanding of the field, and because of all their past blunder the experts may understand the risks and rewards of adopting a new idea better than the novice can. For example, to increase creativity in kids, a new teacher may tell them to draw, sing, or dance in any way they want. But some kids might misuse this tactic and may disrupt the entire class, by intentionally singing or dancing loudly. Whereas, if the kids were given some directions, or if some rules were enforced, they might have been doing their work silently and properly.
Lastly, a novice can learn so much from the experts in their field. All the great CEOs, surgeons, pilots, scientists, were once someone's student. They all must have had a mentor to guide them and teach them. Thus, even if the students turn out to be more successful than their mentors, it was because students learned from them. For example, a fresh out of college software developer will need a guide to help him navigate the corporate world. He may need someone to teach him how to manage a team or a project. This novice may later give some brilliant ideas, but he would not have thought of those ideas if he was not aware of the old ones. Thus the mentorship was also important for his and his field's success.
In conclusion, both novice and experts are important for the progress of the field. The novice because of their freshness, out-of-the-box thinking, and experts for their experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 54
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7 000 years ago and within 3 000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans general 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 60
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most c 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 965, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n doing their work silently and properly Lastly a novice can learn so much from t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2469.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65849056604 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36973095045 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447169811321 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 772.2 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 530.0 23.0359550562 2301% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2469.0 118.986275619 2075% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 530.0 23.4991977007 2255% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 152.0 5.21951772744 2912% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168397226049 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168397226049 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129217142006 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885291560036 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 265.5 14.1392134831 1878% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -458.01 48.8420337079 -938% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 208.8 12.1743820225 1715% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.23 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 32.72 8.38706741573 390% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 214.0 11.2143820225 1908% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.7820224719 458% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.