The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart provided offers insight into the main reasons for the deterioration of agricultural land, whereas the table given illustrates the affection of these causes upon three regions of the world during the 1990s.
It is clear that overgrazing represents the largest proportion whereas over-cultivation is the smallest. Besides, the percentage degraded land in Europe was the biggest while the opposite was true of that in North America.
Regarding the pie chart, the portion of overgrazing accounted for nearly 35% of the total causes for worldwide land degradation. Deforestation and over-cultivation shared similar percentages with 30% for the former and 28% for the latter.
With regard to the bar chart, Europe accounted for 23% of the total land degraded, followed by Oceania and North America with 13% and 5%, respectively. Furthermore, over-cultivation seemed to deteriorate North America the most with 3.3%. Meanwhile, deforestation and overgrazing were the main reasons why in Europe and Oceania, with 9.8% and 11.3% in turn.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that schools are the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, regarding, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54037267081 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2012231951 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4234222187 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186230014776 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816392784047 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121664985273 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133778859245 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146656848181 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, regarding, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54037267081 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2012231951 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577639751553 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4234222187 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186230014776 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816392784047 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121664985273 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133778859245 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146656848181 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.