Agree or disagree? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide
Travelling all over the world is an exciting activity that some people prefer to do it with a group and a tour guide but others want to experience by themselves. I put myself in the second category and I want to explain my results below;
First of all, I really believe that being accompany with a tour leads in wasting time and energy. let me extend more with an example; Last year, my family and me decided to go to Paris, hence I arranged it with a travel agency for our arrival and departure, scheduling the whole travel and joining to a tour. Although our tour leader was trying to do all his bests but unfortunately our team was really boring and lazy! We couldn't match with each other to be on time to go to historical places or visit monumental structures and even we failed in planning for lunch or dinner. They were asleep exact the time of going to Eiffel Tower, therefore we should wait for them in the lobby and we missed the golden time of seeing the beautiful outward of sky and the city on the top of the tower. Also, this occurred for some other entertainment plans and I wish I could separate from them and continue my trip lonely! From my perspective, the more participants in a tour, the more disturbances in programs are.
Furthermore, travelling alone has some advantages in my point of view. I believe that an individual should walk on the streets, see native people closely and talk them, taste traditional foods introduced by local dwellers and as a whole be familiar with the whole texture of a city. When you travel with a tour, you are forced to obey the plans of the leader, on other words you have chance to go to some popular places and try some usually foods of a country, merely. There is not enough time to discover all places or talk to their inhabitants, see their customs and consequently, you have a perspective of your travel similar to others or written in the books. In a nutshell, not only won't you have your own experience, but also you already live other's experience!
In summary, for the two important reasons of wasting the time in order to match with others of a tour and also, because of trying to find out everything as you can enjoy them, I provide the hypothesize that travelling without tour or leader is better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Agree or disagree The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 76
- dinosarus are considered as endotherms or not 76
- the effort to seek for standard certifications for wood companies will not lead to more companies favor to do 76
- agree or disagree Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 60
- airships can be widely used nowadays 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Let
... tour leads in wasting time and energy. let me extend more with an example; Last ye...
^^^
Line 2, column 424, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...our team was really boring and lazy! We couldnt match with each other to be on time to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ything as you can enjoy them, I provide the hypothesize that travelling without tour or leader ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, really, second, so, therefore, well, in summary, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 13.8261648746 181% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1859.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50121065375 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55734780375 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518159806295 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3774580874 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 100.406767564 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5454545455 20.6045352989 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 5.45110844103 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134125145035 0.236089414692 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581577296127 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487372725788 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968315287349 0.150856017488 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315730886481 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 11.7677419355 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.