Do you agree or disagree?
Playing computer games is waste of time.Children should not be allowed to play them.
Nowadays Children tend to play a lot of computer games and mobile games which are not really good for their health neither in their studies. In my opinion playing games is a waste of time, I completely agree with it, personally I too believe that children nowadays should not be allowed to play. I fell this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, playing games on computer also called as blue screen is harmful for children's eyes. The constant watch to the screen harms the eyes slowly, children get glasses because of continues watching the screen. My personal experience is a compelling example of this, I used to play game on my computer continuously for many hours which would lead to soar eyes, headaches or sleep deprivation. And in few months I went to check my eyes and the doctors said to I had got negative number glasses and to reduces screen time. Moreover, you became physical less active which is not good for children in growth age. They should be more involved in physical activities which help them in good health rather than computer games.
Secondly, I think it doesn't really help you in anyways. Children in growth age should more be focused on academics rather than such games, and they should be doing more their knowledge stuff which will help them in future. Drawing from an own seen experience, for instance a cousin of my always used to play games of computer, later on he got addicted to it. And while his primary school exams he couldn't help himself but only play game. It was very difficult for his parents to make him sit for his studies. It was tremendously difficult for his parents to completely get him out of the gaming zone. Eventually, started studying properly which helped him for his future. It’s certainly clear to see why children should not be allowed to play computer game on continuous bases.
I strongly believe that children of growth must be more focused of their studies and curriculum because games harms children eye and it doesn't help them for future or academics purpose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Iman karim | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-24 | sonyeoso | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-08 | ngaliulin | 60 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | prakriti malla | 60 | view |
- Ways to stop the spread of the cane toad in Australia 78
- In order to became financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Do you agree or disagree 76
- Chevalier de Seingalt s long memoir of his life and adventures Summarize both the passage and the lecture points 73
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them Do you agree or disagree 73
- The decrease in population of sea otters in Alaskan 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n computer games. Secondly, I think it doesnt really help you in anyways. Children in...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 212, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ir knowledge stuff which will help them in future. Drawing from an own seen experience, f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
.... And while his primary school exams he couldnt help himself but only play game. It was...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...because games harms children eye and it doesnt help them for future or academics purpo...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p them for future or academics purpose.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, first, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, i think, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74309392265 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44995232899 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522099447514 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3122727975 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3888888889 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383580223778 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125415546233 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124671300112 0.0737576698707 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2483756678 0.150856017488 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849153723582 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.