In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Nowadays, there is a lot of improvements in the field of agriculture, however, which not be able to meet the needs of humankind. Most of the continents cannot harvest enough crops due to climate change and government management. If we solve these two problems, we can enlarge the size of the reaping.
Firstly, our mother world has been facing climatic fluctuations last 20 years, which affects live creatures and farming. This climatic fluctuation is the result of human error such as heavy industrializations and incorrect allocation of sources. Chemical wastes and fossil fuels produced by heavy industries are affecting the ozone layer, the earth is accepting too much UV light. If we could decrease those wastes efficiently, it can considerably affect our atmospheric present condition. So that, farmers could be able to harvest more.
Another way to increase our crop is government should do developments to farm management which support farmers by flexible conditions of taxation or boost the budget on this field. Because of that, people who work in farming will be rise owing to this tax-free situation. Many ranchers quitting the field of agriculture on account of legal inconvenience.
Although many new technological breakthroughs have been made in agriculture, millions of citizens are starving by reason of food shortage. Heavy industries have been rising in recent years, particularly in developed countries however it is affecting the environment badly. We should stop the production of hazardous waste in order to improve climate change. Additionally, the government needs to pay attention to creating favorable employment for farmers. Then more employees who have an interest of work on agriculture.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 78
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values 78
- Percentage of UK people who consumed the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry 11
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42164179104 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12326360759 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660447761194 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.535017193 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.75 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.06120827912 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.056311429269 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0180295229022 0.084324248473 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354306939523 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0318719331183 0.151304729494 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267049744599 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.