The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart makes a comparison between Chinese and the US birth rates over an 80-year period from 1920 to 2000.
A glance at the graph provided reveals striking similarities between the fertility of China and the USA during the time frame. Another interesting point is that whereas the birth rates of both countries were comparable until 1950, the gap between the two widened after this time as fertility in China began to slide away.
Looking at the details, increasing from a-tenth to 15% in 1935, the birth rate of China plunged to only 5% in 1940. This figure levelled off until 1945, at which point it experienced an exponential climb to one-fifth before dropping considerably to just under 10% by the year 1955. During the latter half of the century, the fertility of this country witnessed a steady decline.
As regards the USA, the birth rate fluctuated between 11 and 13 percent prior to 1940. This was followed by a rapid fall in the next 5 years, reaching somewhere in the vicinity of 5 percent. The following 5 years saw a marked growth of this figure, peaking at 15% in 1950, after which it underwent a sustained fall.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The diagram below shows what happens to pollutants from farming and industry once in a river system Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 72
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below provides statistics on several major metro MRT systems around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The illustration shows information about how an igloo is built from snow Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labeled coffee and bananas in 1999and 2004 in five European countries 73
- People tend to work longer hours nowadays Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves their families and the society so working hours should be restricted Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, whereas, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72864321608 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51496367706 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608040201005 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3686328884 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196765662194 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824654435669 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809318337346 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130403861311 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741748224718 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.