Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
These days, some people advocate that a large amount of time and budget is allocated for wild breeds’ maintenance and that this fund, in a more superior way, should be expended on the human race. From my vantage point, I utterly appreciate the expense of advancing human life rather than protecting wild animals.
Wild creatures endow us with a plethora of consumables and organic materials that possess high nutritional and educational values, hence, investing in preserving wild beings will lay the basis for boosting several fields hereafter. Nonetheless, this investment also remains shortcomings as wild animal conservation areas require an extremely colossal expenditure on functioning cost and may bring counterproductivity. These sanctuaries, unwittingly, sometimes do not resemble the natural environment to facilitate animals’ adaptation, and this leads them to bear no descendant blocking the probabilities for natural reproduction. Another adversity is that conserving wild creatures can neither minimize the loss of habitats nor preclude illegal over-poaching. Should we protect wildlife while unrestricted hunting takes place on a daily basis, the ecosystem will still perish, and this, somewhat, renders our endeavours pointless.
Conversely, it stands to reason that the government should offer proper subsidization for advancing people’s living standards. The majority of people emphasize that upgrading the educational foundation is an underlying prerequisite benefiting both humanity and wildlife. Once people’s cognitive competence has been advanced, the over-hunting ratio will decline subsequently. Besides, there is a common endorsement that one of the ways to better community is to develop natural-based medicine as non-human animals containing rare genes are of the crucial substances for pharmaceutical inventions. This outlook, however, fails to consider that medicinal animals will rapidly be on the verge of extinction if we keep exploiting them without any protective resolutions. Unfortunately, maintaining biodiversity and improving people’s quality of life concurrently is deemed to be futile, thus giving prominence to social welfare still makes it a priority due to its overwhelming strengths.
In summary, I myself believe that substituting budgetary distribution to animal protection for humanity demands is a sustainable guarantee of mankind’s survival. Once social welfare is flourished, the ecosystem will also be recovered simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 11
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problem does it cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 89
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 84
- The graph below gives information about Dubai gold sales from 2000 to 2010 84
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity due to its overwhelming strengths. In summary, I myself believe that substi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, hence, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, still, thus, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06779661017 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39890029587 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680790960452 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.199547509 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.2 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220940675053 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655510945141 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412133610867 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131974922188 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418311163773 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.22 12.4159519038 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.