The graph illustrates the rate of women's membership of parliament in 5 different European countries( Belgium, Spain, Germany, UK, Italy) between 2000 and 2012.
The graph illustrates the rate of women's membership of parliament in 5 different European countries( Belgium, Spain, Germany, UK, Italy) between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, it is obvious that while the percentage of German and British women's membership slightly changed over the periods, the rate in Belgium and Italy had significant upward trends.
According to the statistics, in 2004, the number of women in the three European countries' (Italy, Britain, Germany) parliaments was about 3%, 18% and 32% respectively while the rest of regions (Belgium and Spain) had sharp increases from around 23% and 29% to 35% and above.Furthermore, Belgium remained unchanged till the end of the given period.
Looking at the details, in 2008, Italy experienced a dramatic growth of nearly 20% in the meantime Spain showed a similar trend (35%) as Belgium and stayed without progresses over the periods. While Germany was still constant (above 30%), the rate of female members in parliament went up to 20% in the UK.In the following year, the Britain and Italy made up a similar amount ( around 23%) meanwhile Belgium reached at a peak of nearly 40%.
- Today states spend a huge amount of money annually on their space researches one of the spaces Mars is the centre of scientists eyes It is often argued that this investment should be directed to other problematic issues to solve them instead 89
- Task 2 In many countries it is acceptable that governments spend money on religious holidays such as New Year To what extent do you agree and disagree with this 56
- The line graph illustrates the number of visitors came to a particular island of Caribbean from 2010 to 2017 67
- The graph illustrates the rate of women s membership of parliament in 5 different European countries Belgium Spain Germany UK Italy between 2000 and 2012 78
- The two types of figures table and pie chart illustrate four main reasons caused land degradation regionally and nationwide
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 271, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...rom around 23% and 29% to 35% and above.Furthermore, Belgium remained unchanged till the en...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eriods. While Germany was still constant above 30%, the rate of female members in...
^^
Line 8, column 303, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... in parliament went up to 20% in the UK.In the following year, the Britain and Ita...
^^
Line 8, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itain and Italy made up a similar amount around 23% meanwhile Belgium reached at ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12972972973 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76215687311 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.9775719468 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.8 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 22.9334400587 161% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48646039412 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.293003706575 0.103423049105 283% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.300349911688 0.0843802449381 356% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348294230571 0.15604864568 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.31297119568 0.0819641961636 382% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.2 13.2329268293 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.38 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.