Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?
It is observed that modern tasks both at home as well as work are completed progressively more by robots. This is ultimately a beneficial development, as will be elucidated in the following essay.
Discussing the positives of having the aid of robots and other automated machines at work, proponents tend to highlight their contribution to eliminating human errors and elevating consequent work quality. This could be exemplified by the use of robots to collect samples from dangerous environments such as erupting volcanoes or the installment of programmed robot arms along an automobile production line. Understandably, the high performance of automation threatens workers’ job security. While replacement is likely, the transition tends to be gradual, allowing both businesses and workers to adapt. This also revolutionizes the workforce, which would shift the focus to solving more challenging problems such as aging population and green energy.
Aside from the aforementioned gain, living standards are also heightened by the presence of robots. Thanks to them, chores could be completed and security is enhanced without requiring human input. Dumbo, for instance, is an increasingly popular robot that is utilized to pick up litter and clean floors. With the relief of certain domestic tasks, there come worries that people will become less active and less autonomous. However, this argument fails to take into consideration that the newly available free time could be decisively invested in exercise and leisure pursuits, which are fulfilling in their own right.
In brief, it is in my conviction that integrating robots into households and workplaces is a positive trend, ultimately resulting in the more effective use of the labor force and higher quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- The practice of illegally hunting wild animals continues to cause concern in many countries particularly developing countries What are the causes of such hunting What are the effects on the animals and on the wider human society in these countries and bey 89
- Some employers are willing to give their workers a certain amount of unpaid leave believing this benefits the individual and the organization Other employers see no merit in this arrangement and discourage it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 67
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 47, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...observed that modern tasks both at home as well as work are completed progressively more b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in brief, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51459854015 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06871809428 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7745956778 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.230769231 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299641612666 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821172676686 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674887064098 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169442795134 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852887397249 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.