Schools are the only place to receive true education? Do you agree or disagree?
Along with the advance in social civilizations, formal training is aimed to acquire; however, people currently still are confused with the unique role of schools in educating. Despite this long-lasting accepted belief, not only I but most people conspicuously recognize that books and hands-on experience have equal importance in distributing true knowledge.
On the one hand, schools are always the greatest places where students are able to obtain official knowledge. The fact that a handful of experienced and well-trained teachers can be the strongest evidence to prove the correctness of attending schools indicates that with their teaching methods, students can swiftly receive suitable education. People widely believe that schooling is not something simple to get through reading books or searching on websites, it requires many more skills that only teachers can help with. Besides, full-equipped schools are ideal for learners to practice theories trained by teachers so that they can solidly concrete the valuable knowledge. That is why they can save much time and be more confident in learning as well as working in the future without facing many times of failure. However, this stereotype is no longer suitable for modern society.
Conversely, the exclusive role of schools has been replaced partly by first-hand experience and the availability of material. As a matter of books, previous generations did not have access to ample sources of knowledge; therefore, teachers in schools were the only ones whom they relied on to absorb new things. However, the drastic change of the internet and websites without any constraints has shed new light on completely new awareness. Apparently, online books are now shared freely with passionate learners who are in search of true education, which facilitates the learning paths of those from various walks of life. Furthermore, practical knowledge in this day and age is considered the best teacher ever for learners. The reason is that abstract knowledge is an arduous task regardless of the convenience of fully modern devices supported so that only direct experience earned by the expense of time and endeavors are capable of teaching learners. Not schools nor teachers can do that. Hence, no matter how dedicated teachers nor modern schools are, there are still several ways to achieve formal education.
In conclusion, with all aforementioned convincing claims, schools are not the only approach to knowledge, books and experience do play the same role.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-24 | Naomi_manager | 83 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | Naomi_manager | 76 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 89 | view |
| 2021-06-21 | KEVA | 89 | view |
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change What is your opinion 81
- Task Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world Do you agree or disagree 60
- The maps give information about a university sports court 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 80
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts in the work Do you agree or disagree 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40203562341 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85136956331 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582697201018 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5766060505 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.882352941 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163557840601 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539347818343 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440976268962 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107308189788 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202750426631 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, but, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40203562341 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85136956331 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582697201018 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5766060505 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.882352941 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163557840601 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539347818343 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440976268962 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107308189788 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202750426631 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.