Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the issue of punishment has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that harsh punishment should be imposed on young criminals who perpetrate serious offences in the same way as adults, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, the evidence supporting this contention will be discussed alongside relevant examples.
On the one hand, those who claim that juvenile delinquents should be penalised as harshly as adults do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that they need to learn that not only do their actions have consequences, but illegal behaviour will not be tolerated. To provide a hypothetical example, if other impressionable people witnessed their peers receiving punishment for unlawful activities, they would be less likely to perpetrate crimes that may lead them to be incarcerated in jail, meaning that harsh punishment could act as a deterrent.
My opinion, however, is that teenage criminals should not receive the same penalties as adult criminals. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that the youth are generally less able to distinguish between right and wrong than adults. Thus, obliging young criminals to take the same responsibility for their crimes as adults is unfair. Another convincing reason is that adolescents should have a chance to change and to become law-abiding citizens. If they are punished severely, then this opportunity might be lost and they might enter into a life of crime, which exerts a detrimental influence on our society. Therefore, other methods as punishment, such as vocational training and community service, should be imposed on young offenders in order to help them reintegrate back into society. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that depriving youngsters of opportunities to reflect on their crimes by inflicting the same punishment on them as adults should be discouraged for the reasons discussed above.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-01 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
2021-06-29 | idid382002 | 84 | view |
2021-06-26 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- Q Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what exatent do you agree or disagree 67
- Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Q4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q More and more children are accessing the internet unsupervised This can sometimes put them at risk What problems do you think parents face when dealing with their children using the Internet How can this problem be solved 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that deprivin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1853.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37101449275 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92828803663 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4459766518 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8125 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310971268099 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892892309557 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830159631944 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189134758892 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067049728789 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.