The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period.
What is compared in the supplied chart is how much junk was manufactured by six distinct nations in the years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
In each of three years, the U.S produced more waste than Ireland, Japan, Korea, Poland, and Portugal combined. Also noteworthy is the fact that Korea was the only country that managed to cut down on its debris output by the year 2000.
Between 1980 and 2000, the U.S.A witnessed a leap in waste production from just 131 to well above 190 million tons, and rising trends were also seen in Japan, Poland, and Portugal. Furthermore, there was substantial growth in Japan’s rubbish output, between 28 and 53 million tonnes, whereas Poland and Portugal performed an astounding climb, from 4 to 6.6 and 2 to 5 million tonnes in turn.
The trends for Ireland and Korea were noticeably dissimilar from those described above. In Ireland, unwanted things were found to reach an acceleration more than eightfold, standing at just beneath one million tonnes from 1980 and ending with exactly 5 million tonnes in 2000. Korea, by contrast, cut its waste materials by twelve million tonnes between 1990 and 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-14 | uyenmia | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-13 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-20 | thuphuong2302 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-13 | buiminhduc | 67 | view |
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period 78
- Many people believe cities should not try to preserve their old historic buildings and instead they should destroy them and replace them with modern buildings To what extent do you agree 89
- Many ex criminals commit crimes again after being released from prison What are the reasons for these What measures can be taken to solve the issue 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... 2000. In each of three years, the U.S produced more waste than Ireland, Japan...
^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
..., Korea, Poland, and Portugal combined. Also noteworthy is the fact that Korea was t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
...2000. Between 1980 and 2000, the U.S.A witnessed a leap in waste production fr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.953125 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45187512391 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614583333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1402240026 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165246226036 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734393876985 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371628002104 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960975086047 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228671874437 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.