Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily.
The effective method of making friends has become the topic of great controversy in recent years. There is a considerable body of opinion that the ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily. This paper will elucidate the reasons why I am against this opinion.
On one hand, life satisfaction is what I consider a crucial factor. It is noteworthy that making new friends easily is synonymous with creating social connections and leading to even more interactions. Thanks to this, people are likely to obtain multifarious information from their acquaintance. Accordingly, they are capable of building up a solid foundation of knowledge. With this in mind, they stand a golden chance to exert control over their own motivation, behavior, and social environment. Eventually, this probably gives rise to life satisfaction. More notably, while people are making friends easily, being exposed to various situations is inevitable. In the event of this, there is a likelihood for them to reflect on themselves and evaluate their work against a set of criteria. On the ground of that, it is also conceivable to understand their emotions, strengths, weaknesses, drives, values and goals, and recognize their impact on others. During this process, perfecting themselves in all other aspects of life seems to be on the cards. Under those circumstances, it makes it feasible for them to gain more motivation to make a strenuous efforts. Given these points, making new friends effortlessly greatly contributes to life satisfaction.
On the other hand, some people might express a different view that making new friends effortlessly discourages them from cultivating a circle of truly supportive friendships. As a consequence, it creates a huge burden on life satisfaction. Albeit that might be true, it is just applicable to a minority. People have already well thought about the plan to felicitously find a truly supportive acquaintance. Incidentally, there is the apparent purposefulness of their method. Therefore, it is unlikely that making new friends easily prevents their intention to cultivate a circle of truly supportive friendships. Another point often overlooked is that even if the supportive friendships does not exist at the moment, it should be considered as the chance for them to acquire social skills. To exemplify, the social skills we might be acquire are effective communication, active listening, relationship management, and conflict resolution. By the same token, they have an incentive to behave ethically in any relationships. They are given the opportunity to gain more appreciation from people around and find the truly supportive acquaintances, which creates a significant impact on the current state of affairs. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, they have a propensity to enhance their work performance, job satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Thus, indeed, empowers them to ameliorate their life satisfaction. By and large, people should put off the idea that making friends easily preclude them from cultivating a circle of truly supportive friendships.
In summary, life satisfaction is a convincing reason for my disapproval. I hope that people take this writing into great consideration to gather diverse perspectives on the issue regarding the effective method of making friends
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who cannot accept the criticism from others will not be successful at working in a group 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more important to happiness than the ability to make new friends easily
- It is often not a good thing for people to move to a new town or a new country because of the loss of old social connection 70
- It is important for everyone to know about what happening all around the world even though the events have not affect our daily life 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...of opinion that the ability to maintain a small number of friends for a long time is more importa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1154, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effort'?
Suggestion: effort
...ain more motivation to make a strenuous efforts. Given these points, making new friends...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int often overlooked is that even if the supportive friendships does not exist at...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, incidentally, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in summary, by and large, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2881.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42561205273 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22211380482 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514124293785 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 906.3 618.680645161 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6319523966 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0333333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 27.0 11.8709677419 227% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248976289312 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623981010146 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120810184562 0.0737576698707 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188119249523 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143020945016 0.0645574589148 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 86.8835125448 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.