Economic growth in recent years in both developed countries and developing countries made some people richer. However, research shows that people in developing countries are happier, people in developed countries seem not happier than before. Why does this happen? What can be learned from this?
It is claimed that the more thriving one country’s economy is, the more wealthy their dwellers are. Nevertheless, a recent study illustrates that the proportion of people in developing countries own more immense lives than that of developed countries. In this essay, I will outline the reasons why this phenomenon occurs and what morals can be drawn from this.
Several peculiars hold the responsibility of the existence of this issue. First and foremost, the tip of the iceberg of a country’s economy widens the gap between the level of happiness their citizens own in daily life. In developed countries, the economy is consistently in its prime time over millennials, resulting in the continuous improvement of the folks’ living standards. They are supposed to earn a costly living style, in which daily shopping and extensive luxurious holidays play a pivotal role in their life. Subsequently, they take everything for granted as the habit to consume a host of brand stuff such as Louis Vuitton, Chanel, or Dior. Developed countries’ people have already earned a flourished lifestyle; notwithstanding, they are not as happy as the time before the economic growth undergoes a more successful stage. By contrast, people who live in developing countries admit to having been through a more happy life when the government’s budget surges. Before reaching its highest peak of economy, the citizens might have suffered from severe poverty, including starving or even deadly diseases such as measles, scabies, or leprosy,.. They are meant to earn a better living standard; however, their monthly wage is so little that they can ill afford the basic necessaries to facilitate a healthy lifestyle. Obviously, that may lead to several societies’ vices such as drug addiction, babies’ abortion, crime cases. It is no doubt when their countries leap a page into a thriving economy, the people will definitely earn a happier life with the elimination of poverty and so on.
This phenomenon has crossed the large influx of developing and developed countries, namely Vietnam, Korea, Japan, or Chinese, etc,.., which leaves us a meaningful message on the way we live our lives. No matter how our financial background is, we have to always be in a ready motion to tackle the problems that may unexpectedly evolve our lives. Secondly, it is vital to keep our mind in a good mood so that it is a lot easier to enjoy happiness.
Overall, It is clearly seen that the growth in the economy may contribute to the wealthier and happier life of most people. Moreover, some people contend that richness is not the main culprit that guarantees people to gain happiness in life, there is quality time with friends and families too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-02 | TRAN NGOC LINH | 78 | view |
- The table compares the numbers of five different kinds of vehicles that were registered in Australia in three different years 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The charts below show the proportion of people s spending on different commodities and services in a particular European country in 1958 and 2008 84
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 73
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 78
- films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1021, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re reaching its highest peak of economy, the citizens might have suffered from se...
^^
Line 3, column 1156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ses such as measles, scabies, or leprosy,.. They are meant to earn a better living...
^^
Line 3, column 1157, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...es such as measles, scabies, or leprosy,.. They are meant to earn a better living ...
^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...y Vietnam, Korea, Japan, or Chinese, etc,.., which leaves us a meaningful message ...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... Vietnam, Korea, Japan, or Chinese, etc,.., which leaves us a meaningful message o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 447.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11185682327 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85562386024 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568232662192 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6059321965 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.263157895 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5263157895 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296120837178 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853358513349 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101066910292 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171489709601 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805901429296 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.