It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
A controversy has been raised surrounded the issue whether punishment should be applied as an essential mean in educating children. I take the view against such an idea.
When it comes to right and wrong, it relates to manner, behavior and moral. I strongly believe that punishment is an immoral way of educating young child. It is said that many parents have employed harsh punishments, including psychologically aggressive and physically violent to teach their children what is right and what is not. These are not only considered as violence against children, but also improper ways of teaching the young how to behave. Therefore, using such severe punishments is not suitable in the case.
Furthermore, some sanctions affect children psychologically, causing the adverse effects. The young was influenced by the penalties, and started to bully their peer. As a result, punishments are not a successful solution for youngsters to distinct the right and wrong since it brings up more violence. These measures affect the young deeply, and can hardly be alleviated.
However, I deem that minor sanctions such as detention or grounded can be applied in certain situation where a youngster disobeys or rebels. While being grounded or getting a detention, parents and teachers can set down rules and boost children to learn or do homework without playing video games. Cutting down money or phone is another non-extreme measure that could be applied. By virtue of such, a child can rectify the mistakes and avoiding replicating bad actions.
In sum, I do not advocate for punishments, but to some certain extent, parents and teachers can consider using some approximate minor punishments.
- The environmental problems facing today’s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can to improve the situation. Governments and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.To what 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003. 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods Summarise the in 73
- The graphs below show the age structure of a European country from 1901 to 1981 and a prediction for 2021. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25555555556 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91434416644 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614814814815 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0287206431 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190870970262 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540750307674 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497049104537 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098428194245 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396794531551 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.