The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The pictures illustrate how a waterfront area of Darwin town had developed over a 5-year period
Overall, this place had undergone many significant shifts with the most noticeable one being the removal of the area for industrial activities. Also, the construction of a brand new harbor was also a significant alteration for the local people’s income
Looking at the map in 2009, the industrial area occupied the majority of this location. A part of this industrial site together with a lake was encircled by a footpath which was bordered by the convenient center to the north, a school to the northwest, and a couple of houses to the south. Also, there were two swimming pools constructed adjacent to the coast and a fishing area in the northeast corner of the map
By 2014, all of the industrial areas had been flattened and planted with many new trees. To the east of the map was an addition of a university building and a few accommodations were erected parallel to the old ones. The industrial area in the north which had been surrounded by a circled footpath had also been demolished to make way for a new swimming pool. While there was a brand new harbour constructed to the southeast of the area and a footpath erected from the west to provide access to this harbor, there was no transformation witnessed in the lake, the school, the swimming pools and the fishing area
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 78
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The table data shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the United Kingdom in 2005 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...northeast corner of the map By 2014, all of the industrial areas had been flattened and...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76763485477 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81494827955 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489626556017 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2845355804 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.142857143 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4285714286 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11202669666 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560042970501 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368442810057 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805949878314 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034876017141 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.