Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. [Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.]
First of all, the speaker asserts that only it comes from experts, critical judgement of work in any given field has value. It is true that experts’ critical judgement has merits in their field. Nevertheless, we should not ignore critical judgement from public. In my point of view, critical judgement from public has a helpful influence on political, educational, and scientific fields. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the speaker.
To begin with, critical judgement of work has a positive effect on political area. Only people can know what they want. Through people’s judgement, people can make leaders of the country pressed to enhance the performance of management. An judgement from public force government introspection, which lead government to change policy for people, and to create more benefits for the public. Even if the government has supreme power in the country, they cannot ignore people’s force; The Watergates scandal, a major political scandal in the United States, is an illustration. Due to public judgement, it leads the U.S government court to have a series of reformations to guarantee the security of the country. In a words, in political fields critical judgement is useful to enhance the management of country.
Second, critical judgement exercise an practical influence in educational fields. In educational fields, critical judgement is used to retain the accuracy of information. Students always criticize teacher’s teaching content. With critical judgement, teacher can make students hardworking. On the other hand, judgement from students improve the teacher’s quality of teaching. For example, when teacher teach a course using a boring PowerPoint, students are unwilling to study. Through students’ critical judgement, teacher can change the quality of teaching. As a results, high quality of PowerPoint will make students willing to study. In sum, critical judgement is useful whether it is from experts.
Finally, in the realm of science, critical judgement is useful to have scientists exacting. No scientific achievement is easy; Through critics, scientists will take so great pains to create the achievement without laxing. For instance, semiconductor development would have reached a plateau since 2000 years; No one thinks it will continue to evolve; However, Prof. Chenming Hu, successfully invent a special structure transistor, FinFET, which made semiconductor developing going on to now. Consequently, people can use a higher efficiency of cellphone, computer, and even self-driving car. In brief, because requirement is from public but not from experts, public critical judgement have scientists taking pains to evolve technology.
To sum up, critical judgement from public is beneficial in political, educational, and scientific fields. With people’s critical judgement, Such a useful judgement as to increase public welfare. Thus, I totally disagree with what the speaker says.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | AtharvaKale | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-21 | HSNDEK | 83 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | avidwriter1771 | 50 | view |
- We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi 66
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- It is better for elders to take risks and explore new things than young people 60
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 58
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
... enhance the performance of management. An judgement from public force government ...
^^
Line 3, column 614, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...Due to public judgement, it leads the U.S government court to have a series of re...
^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a word' or simply 'words'?
Suggestion: a word; words
...arantee the security of the country. In a words, in political fields critical judgement...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... Second, critical judgement exercise an practical influence in educational fiel...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students hardworking. On the other hand, judgement from students improve the teac...
^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
... can change the quality of teaching. As a results, high quality of PowerPoint will make s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in brief, as a result, first of all, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 40.0 12.9106741573 310% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2517.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68171557562 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03104042359 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505643340858 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 756.9 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1763563496 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.9 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7666666667 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23333333333 5.21951772744 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142631232494 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049245293237 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453773641162 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0974808702149 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517343743473 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 48.8420337079 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.07 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.