Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, opinions are divided regarding whether raising the minimum driving age is the most effective way to enhance road safety. In my point of view, I am opposed to such an idea since it does not comprehensively address the main culprit of traffic accidents and other measures are needed.
Adjusting the minimum required driving age might be advocated since the youth are not mature and experienced enough to handle dangerous situations on the road. Therefore, raising the legal age for getting a driver's license enables youngsters to practice more, ensuring their abilities to deal with different driving scenarios. However, such reasoning is flawed as the lack of expert driving skills is only one of the many causes of traffic accidents. Irresponsible driving habits such as speeding and driving under the influence of alcohol or inadequate transport infrastructure also endanger road users. Increasing the legal driving age only has partial impact in improving road safety; thus the aforementioned idea should be rejected
In lieu of intervening in driving age, other viable solutions should be adopted to curb road incidents. First of all , governments should expend money on regular road maintenance. In fact, there are numerous road casualties due to the poor condition of roads’ surface; hence upgrading the quality of road’s systems is essential to protect road drivers. Moreover, stringent control and regulations should be imposed on driving offenses. For example, there should be more traffic wardens appointed to manage and punish drivers breaking the rules. As a result, they will fear gaining further punishment and avoid re -offending.
In conclusion, raising the minimum is not the most sensible action to develop road safety and other proposals should be considered.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | emzin | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | UYNDNG | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-29 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people spend a lot of money attending cultural or sports events is it a good or bad thing Give your opinion and example from your own experience 78
- Some people believe that air travels should be allowed to grow without limits Others think that the government should limit air travels Discuss both views give your opinion 84
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ted to curb road incidents. First of all , governments should expend money on regu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44483985765 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82977834656 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626334519573 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7978141088 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222404036957 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747656785645 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055739392933 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129618815325 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479161583877 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.