Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face, is this a positive or negative development?
In today’s society, rather than taking part in direct communication, people tend to do this through the Internet network. Some believe that this phenomenon is beneficial for people while I do state that the disadvantage outweighs these.
Firstly, online socialization can result in negativities in people's daily life. This has been shown that the more addicted to virtual life, the harder development of crucial skills can be gained such as communication skills or problem-solving skills. This is because people spend the majority of their time chatting with others through social platforms like Facebook and Instagram, therefore, being indifferent in interacting with others in reality. As a consequence, it is hard for people to find a good job or building up attachment in relationships afterward.
Additionally, this phenomenon also leads to a detrimental effect on people's psychology. Communication is indeed a very basic demand of each person. If people lack direct communication and emotional support, the lonely feeling and even isolation from society will be deeply rooted in people's minds. For example, many people suffer mental disorders like depression or insomnia, which their physical health even be affected.
Moreover, people choosing online interactions can be exposed to violated privacy. Because of the communication with fake identities or anonymous accounts, the personal information of users is likely to be stolen. Taking the commercial aspect as an example, some people take advantage of this for the wrong purposes such as selling it to third parties at sky-high prices.
In conclusion, there are opposing opinions about whether socialize online is a positive development or not. With these aforementioned ideas, I am subscribed to the view that this kind of communication brings a much greater negative influence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | citra orwela | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | Vinuki | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | Geegeepay | 84 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The pie charts provided illustrate two major changes in the use of modes of transport to a certain university between 2004 and 2009 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 11
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58865248227 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14226019048 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9200346449 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255427246655 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847655363463 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597918514131 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138686513102 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403037915316 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58865248227 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14226019048 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63475177305 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9200346449 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255427246655 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847655363463 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597918514131 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138686513102 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403037915316 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.