Some people say that public money should be used to support the work of theatre companies. Others say that theatre companies should be completely self-funding. Discuss both these view and give your opinion.
Nowadays, people's opinions differ as to whether theatre companies are worth receiving money subsidies. Some believe that the government should take responsibility for this while opponents argue that these companies should promote the finance itself. I do oppose that public money should be distributed equally to all fields by the government.
On the one hand, it is necessary for the authority to support money for theatre companies. Firstly, these companies play a crucial role to preserve and advertise the culture of a country to four corners of the world. The nation’s heritage and traditional customs, in detail, are presented through the performance. Taking the Water Puppet in China as an example, this art form has gained the widespread-attention from worldwide tourists. Moreover, modernization is becoming happen on a relatively large scale nowadays. People now are attracting to the latest inventions such as smartphones, robots, and AI technologies. The country's culture seems to be forgotten sometimes, resulting in the underestimation of related careers and the increase of unemployment in this field. According to today's context, people dedicating to this sector should be supported as a physical motivation and mental one.
On the other hand, there are some reasonable arguments that these companies should self-funding. It is true that not only the cultural aspect can contribute to a country’s development but there are more vital sectors included. Especially developing countries have to focus on key economic sectors such as heavy industries, textiles, and mechanics. Due to the more important concerns, promoting theatre companies is not the most priority of a nation. Additionally, this also results in inequality among all fields. If the government subsidies money for people working in theater companies, there will be more disadvantages for others in different fields. Therefore, it is a bias for special cases while all people have to work the same.
In conclusion, funding for theatre companies is still a topic of debate. I am convinced that these institutions should be endowed with public money for aforementioned reasons.
- The chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women doing regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in a European country in 1995 and 2005 84
- Nowadays more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face is this a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Nowadays, peoples opinions differ as to whether theatre companies are worth receiving m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, as for, as to, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52710843373 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17888974877 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0787769623 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.75 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338270127227 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951726057236 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841368073922 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235355969343 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702442735128 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.