spoken communication is popular than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There is currently a contentious argument over the power of spoken communication and written communication. I totally disagree with this opinion and will explain it in the essay below.
There are many compelling reasons as to why I don’t believe that spoken communication surpasses written one. The first justification is that written communication is the product of its time which helps the later generation reflecting themselves as well as understanding their ancestor’s effort of making peace or great success for the country. That is the greatest mitigation to foster one country’s educated workforce together with the economical growth to thrive in its prime time. Secondly, it is out in the open that such chronicles will be there for good so that the masses can easily reread and sleep on them as a way to raise their own awareness of the emerging status of society and human beings. Meanwhile, the spoken form of communication is once produced, it hardly gives people enough time to memorize or evaluate things.
Although written communication has multiple benefits as are mentioned, it would be imprudent if we ignored the merits of spoken communication. In this day and age, fewer people are inclined to reading habit in comparison to the past. To illustrate, only 7% of Vietnamese read about 20 books in a total year. The same pattern is also seen in a lot of Southeast Asia such as Cambodia, Laos,...It is proven that nowadays people are in the offing to hear and transfer the message through media. In this case, the one who takes advantage of spoken communication seems to have the dominant position.
In conclusion, I believe that the written communication is much weightier than spoken due to its impact on society accompanied by the valuable meaning transferred to the audience. It is evident that the later generation will benefit from the quintessence of the past chronicle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand s population from 1950 to 2050 73
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 56
- some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important 61
- the bar chart below shows the most important causes of stress for different age groups in canada 87
- The chart below shows the results of a British survey taken in 2005 related to the housing preferences of people in the UK 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...’s educated workforce together with the economical growth to thrive in its prime time. Sec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun Southeast seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of Southeasts'.
Suggestion: a lot of Southeasts
... year. The same pattern is also seen in a lot of Southeast Asia such as Cambodia, Laos,...It is p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... seen in a lot of Southeast Asia such as Cambodia, Laos,...It is proven that nowa...
^^
Line 5, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...f Southeast Asia such as Cambodia, Laos,...It is proven that nowadays people are ...
^^
Line 5, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...utheast Asia such as Cambodia, Laos,...It is proven that nowadays people are in t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11182108626 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01638054341 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0638367997 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245798012771 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851740876679 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085127753948 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157258576792 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245172818341 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.