The graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012.
The line graph represents the amount of electricity generated in France by four forms of sources during the period of 32 years, starting from 1980.
Overall,electrcity produced by nuclear station accounted for the highest amount over the period shown, as the primary source of electricity. By contrast, this figure for the remaining means of electricity generation leveled off.
In 1980, It is clear that thermal power was used to produce well over 100 terawatt hours of electricity. At the same time, hydroelectric and nuclear station just generated about 75 terawatt hours of electricty, but there was no electricity produced by renewables power.
Between 1980 and 2005, the amount of electricity generated by nuclear station rose drammatically by nearly 300 terawatt hours and reached the peak of under 450 in 2005. However, there was a negligible rise of 25 terawatt hours of electricty produced by renewables power from 2000 to 2012. Even though thermal power overtook nuclear power in the year of 1980, that statistics remained stable for the rest of period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | M3hrrrrnaz | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | VinaKhoai | view | |
| 2021-10-10 | khushboo choudhary | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | tungxuan | 79 | view |
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 84
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 62
- The chart below 11
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 79
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , electrcity
...32 years, starting from 1980. Overall,electrcity produced by nuclear station accounted f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...station accounted for the highest amount over the period shown, as the primary so...
^^
Line 6, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en though thermal power overtook nuclear power in the year of 1980, that statisti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28070175439 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92640834554 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5518360947 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.875 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246956956415 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108260546056 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664011473092 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145985555572 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691613291846 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.