There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts-especially at a great cost in money and jobs-to save endangered animal or plant species
In disagreement with the given statement, animals and plants bring out the balance in our ecosystem. In the past few years, there are a lot of animal or plant species that have
become extinct due to various human interventions with the environment. Human beings instead of saving our plant and animal species which provide a great value to our
environmental balance, in turn are destroying the animal and plant species by various activities.
People are not trying to save endangered species, instead they are getting benefits in consumption of meat. Consumption of meat in whole word is increasing day-by-day to
a large extent. For example, in China consumption of meat increases every year by almost double of the previous year. There are very less wild life sanctuaries all over world to
save the species that will be extinct and government provides very less funding to these type of activities. In India, government only provides 0.5 percent of it's revenue to
save any animal or plant species.
The increase in cutting down of trees for various purposes like construction, papers for books causing many plants to become extinct. Human beings are not making an
effort to plant more trees while they cut down others. Pollution is another major reason which causes a major disbalance in our environment. For example, in Hong Kong, it has
the highest pollution all over the world. The recent African fires in the forest has not been addressed by any of the government which caused a huge loss to the animals and plants
in the forest. Since COVID has started, due to lockdown, statistics show that there is a huge decline in the pollution all over the world.
Public are not investing in jobs which can save the animal or plant species, because it gives less money when compared to a software engineer. For example, an engineer gets
paid in very large numbers when compared to a keeper in the wild life sanctuaries. Public who are striving to survive will automatically choose a career which pays more, which
will fulfill all of their luxuries rather than doing something out of passion for animals or plants.
So, Human beings have a strong purpose to save our endangered species in order to maintain a balance which thereby improves the health and wealth of the people in the
world. Investing in jobs and money to save endangered animal or plant species will heavily increase our balance in the whole ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-24 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-11 | wopona8219 | 83 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | AtharvaKale | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | Sumilak | 83 | view |
| 2022-05-08 | Siam | 66 | view |
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species 50
- Argument 58
- Requiring university students to take a variety of courses outside their major fields of study is the best way to ensure that students become truly educated 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecies which provide a great value to our environmental balance, in turn are destr...
^^^
Line 8, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... extinct. Human beings are not making an effort to plant more trees while they cu...
^^^
Line 15, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e health and wealth of the people in the world. Investing in jobs and money to sa...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96097560976 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58320203974 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470731707317 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6983662184 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.052631579 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5789473684 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36842105263 5.21951772744 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 16.0 4.97078651685 322% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259992309312 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828937922985 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700864250384 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992548280749 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711675221809 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.