Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you thing laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In the modern world, environmental factors are the key to the developments of many nations. Due to increasing awareness of environmental issues and materials shortages, it is claimed that only a small amount of household waste is recycled which is inadequate to make changes in these serious situations. Consequently, people argue that turning recycling into a legal requirement is the first and foremost way to encourage practicing it. From my point of view, i strongly believe that rules and regulations contribute greatly to efforts to make dwellers recycle more.
This is primarily because citizens, especially in major metropolises, dump garbage irresponsibly. In 2008, results of a research carried out base on the amount of rubbish collected daily was surprisingly with 70% made up of paper, wood and fabric products. Moreover, when law is established, it can influence directly to people as following national rules and regulations has been a symbol of patriotism since ancient time. Furthermore, governments officials can give citizens punishments whenever they disobey the law.
If recycling is not legally required, the consequences can be disastrous. The cases occur as soon as plastic goods are burned or buried, they emit large amount of CO2 into the atmosphere and contaminate the water resources below surface. To gradually mitigate the problematic situations, rules and regulations should impact massively on economic aspects. This can be done by various method such as charging people a sum of money for having thrown away recyclable garbage and raising taxes on disposal products to curb the consumption of customers.
To summarize, rules and regulations can increase humans recycling behaviour by making it legally required. Thus, great deal of pollutants can be reduced to improve environmental as well as personal health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- The map show changes between 1960 and now in the Station street 78
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 78
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48771929825 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12027099864 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673684210526 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0495229149 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273216715639 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819696139755 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797908681466 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152322401525 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932935291693 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.