Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend time on more important subjects.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
It is true that there are conflicting views about whether science of food should be added to education. While some support the idea that students should focus on this subject, I believe with those who argue that there are number of more important majors that students shall concentrate on, instead of the food subject.
At first, science of food is a new subject and it might be dangerous for little children to practice in the very young age. For students, whose age is around 6 and 10, they are not mature enough to realize the risks while in kitchen, furthermore, they could harm themselves during the process of studying as if they use the equipment to treat their food in the wrong way. According to a report on VnExpress news, about 61% children experienced some danger when they practiced what were taught about food by their parents in the kitchen.
On the other hand, there are plenty of other majors, which are a lot more useful and important for the development of little kids without the risks of being hurt, such as: art, music, dancing or even IT. These subjects have been proved to be helpful and increase not only the imagination, but also the health of young people. In Norway, the government passed a policy in 2004 encouraging students to enter art classes instead of the food science in order to help them become more creative and more intelligent.
In conclusion, food is a good subject, but there are so many risks behind it that needed to be considered before adding to school education system for children, instead, majors like art or music should be taught regularly at school due to the fact that they are not only important for the young, but also increase their level of their intelligence quotient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | claraa_ltn | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Miaa | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | Ester Nguyễn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 73
- The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012 69
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7582781457 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44809500617 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.0945342114 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.666666667 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5555555556 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215152850924 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959552063066 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711940866103 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14454110354 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968196200654 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.