read the passage, listen to the lecture and say how the lecture relates to the passage
The author states that using "text speak" causes a negative impact on the learning of language skills. But the speaker denies this and says that test speak is only used as an efficient method to communicate. His declaration is based on purpose of text speak, benefits of learning new phrases, and increase in the exposure to written language.
The writer states that children become lazy when they use text speak and don't put enough effort in writing. But the orator casts a doubt on this by saying that text speak is only used because of the limitation on the size of the message and it makes the children creative to communicate more in lesser text.
The essayist reveals that the children do not learn the correct spellings of the words and tend to make more errors. The lecturer questions this by saying that the children only learn additional phrases, which doesn't impact their originally learnt correct spellings. He also emphasizes that text speak doesn't hamper their formal writing as it is learnt as an add-on to the basic English language.
The author finally asserts that text speak might result in the decrease in literacy levels of the children. The speaker contradicts this by stating that by using text speak the children are more exposed to the written language than they were when communication happened over a phone call. This causes the student to be more in touch with actual reading and writing.
Using all of the speaker's above-mentioned points, the essayist's conjecture is weakened to a great extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | thelmascakess | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | thelmascakess | 66 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Julie.Zhu | 76 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Juhi2810 | 3 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Juhi2810 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children are happier than adults 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When choosing a job it is more important to like the job than make a certain amount of money 70
- read the passage listen to the lecture and say how the lecture relates to the passage 3
- Read a passage listen to the lecture and then summarize how the lecture relates to the passage 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ecome lazy when they use text speak and dont put enough effort in writing. But the o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...en only learn additional phrases, which doesnt impact their originally learnt correct ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to correct'
Suggestion: to correct
...h doesnt impact their originally learnt correct spellings. He also emphasizes that text...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ngs. He also emphasizes that text speak doesnt hamper their formal writing as it is le...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 7, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...th actual reading and writing. Using all of the speakers above-mentioned points, the es...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53865021363 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53488372093 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2753662639 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0454704951879 0.272083759551 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019704384905 0.0996497079465 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340446165515 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0246450128079 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205041424624 0.0443174109184 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.