summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading. you may refer to the passage as you write.
In the lecture, the professor made several points about the first grain food discovered by humans. The professor argues that alternative hypotheses are now been discovered about the first grain food being beer and not bread. However, the author of the passage contends that the first grain food was bread. The professor’s lecture casts doubt on the reading by giving a number of points that are contradictory to that of the passage.
The first point that the professor uses to cast doubt on the reading is the consumption method of wheat. According to the professor, wheat does not have to be grinded before it can be eaten. She stated that if wheat is kept in a wet environment, it will be softer and sweeter to eat. The point about wheat being easy to consume without crushing made by the professor cast doubt on the reading because the author of the passage stated that people had to crush wheat in order to eat it as it was too hard to be eaten.
Another point that the professor used in casting doubt on the reading is the easy fermentation of wheat. It was stated in the passage that the people discovered that fermentation occurred on the paste of the wheat when left to sit for a while. The point is contradicted by the professor that argues that once wheat is stored, fermentation starts to occur almost immediately.
In additional, the professor also stated the cooking method of food used in the past. According to her, food was only cooked in the past and so fire method was not obvious then. This point cast doubts on the passage as it was stated that wheat was baked into bread by the simple method of fire.
In conclusion, the points made in the lecture contrast with the reading and demonstrate that the reading is in doubt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | thelmascakess | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | thelmascakess | 66 | view |
- Tusk University should build a new recreational facility both to attract new students and to better serve the needs of our current student body Tusk projects that enrollment will double over the next 10years based on current trends The new student body is 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement parents should limit the amount of time that children are allowed to use electronic devices like phones tablets and computers use examples and reasons to support your position 66
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading You may refer to the passage as you write 73
- The following appeared in the City Council Proceedings section of the local newspaper in Smithville The city council of Smithville has recommended making changes to police procedures to improve the visibility of the police force These changes include hiri 60
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading you may refer to the passage as you write 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nto bread by the simple method of fire. In conclusion, the points made in the le...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62379421222 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4957444576 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.408360128617 0.540411800872 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.725745463 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148843725304 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718571680048 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735296946888 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112320005678 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569959625133 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.42419426049 80% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.