summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading. You may refer to the passage as you write
In the lecture, the professor made several points about the effects of fire suppression. The professor argues that fire suppression may have long-term effects on the forest it is supposed to protect. However, the author of the passage believes that fire suppression has been of good than harm. The professor mentioned a number of points that cast doubt on the passage.
The first point that the professor uses that casts doubt on the passage is the inability of young trees to grow. According to the professor, there are trees such as young oak that require light but can’t grow due to the availability of bigger trees that are preventing sunlight from reaching the oak trees. The passage stated that the maturation of so many trees has resulted in the formation of a continuous canopy but according to the professor, this will prevent other trees such as oak from growing.
Another point that the professor made that cast doubt on the passage is the increase in the population of deer. The author of the passage stated that animals like deer are not burnt to death and their population has increased notably. However, the professor argues that since the population of deer has increased, plants like oak that are struggling to grow will be eaten by deer.
Also, the author of the passage stated that forest fires reduce the number of nutrients in the soil. The professor however disputed that claim by stating that the nutrients of the soil may indeed be reduced by the fire but nutrients are released from animals and plants that are burnt due to the forest fire. These nutrients from animals and plants replace the nutrients that are lost due to the fire.
In conclusion, the points made in the lecture contrasts the reading and demonstrate that the reading is in doubt.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | thelmascakess | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | thelmascakess | 66 | view |
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading you may refer to the passage as you write 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement parents should limit the amount of time that children are allowed to use electronic devices like phones tablets and computers use examples and reasons to support your position 66
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they challenge specific claims made in the reading passage 73
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard explaining how they cast doubt on the contents of the reading You may refer to the passage as you write 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A university education should be provided free of charge to all interested scholars use examples and reasons to support your position 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, so, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 30.3222958057 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84262295082 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4581550404 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.409836065574 0.540411800872 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8427571574 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127854258969 0.272083759551 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665051049826 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735027950953 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988295254212 0.162205337803 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737120486177 0.0443174109184 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.