The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national and international fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010.
The given line chart illustrates a change in American consumers’ average yearly expenses spent on the cell phone, national, and international fixed-line services over 10 years from 2001 to 2010. Units are measured in dollars.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the figure for cell phone services, whereas a reverse pattern was witnessed in the sum of national fixed-line services. Besides, American citizens had the least preferable interest in paying for international fixed-line services.
In terms of the expenditure on cell phone services, it grew from 200 dollars in 2001 to 500 dollars in 2006, which is the year that recorded the same amount in both groups of the cell phone and national fixed-line, then peaked at over 700 dollars in 2010. On the contrary, the data of national fixed-line services plummeted 200 dollars in the first 6 years of the surveyed period, then kept sinking to the number of 400 dollars.
On the other hand, the money that American users spent on international fixed-line services stably remained at around 300 dollars over a period.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults aged 16 years and over whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months Summarize the informatio 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 84
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, then, whereas, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17045454545 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77456626794 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2104912055 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344753332699 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15102182528 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960776880526 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20874961021 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706695513212 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.