Some believe that students should be taught how to compete while others say that they should be taught to cooperate. What is your opinion?
Whether children should be taught to compete or cooperate with their peers remains a question of intense debate. In my opinion, both competition and cooperation are essential factors to children’s success for a variety of reasons.
On the one hand, fostering a competitive environment can greatly increase children’s learning efficiency. Without a rival, children usually bear in mind the misconception that they are the most knowledgeable students and that it is unnecessary to make progress. Conversely, when facing competition from others, children will have to make greater attempts to achieve their goals, or else they’ll become failures. Therefore, competition can be a great incentive for children to improve their academic ability, as well as to train their confidence to take risks and overcome challenges. In addition, this virtue comes in handy in adult life. For example, in the business world, competition is a standard part of winning contracts. Definitely, successful businessmen are useful adults for society
On the other hand, cooperation is of equal importance in terms of group assignments and team sports. For instance, a project on the treatment of diseases like cancer and AIDS can never be a one-man show because such work requires joint efforts and mutual assistance among group members. Moreover, by cooperating with their peers, children will acquire numerous life skills such as communication skills, negotiation skills, problem-solving skills and conflict management skills. What’s more, a cooperative environment can build positive relationships between students, which is extremely vital to create a learning community that values diversity.
To conclude, both competition and cooperation are key factors to training children to become productive citizens of society. Therefore, children should learn to discern what circumstances they have to apply these attributes in order to reach the highest levels of success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 80 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 78 | view |
- Some people think that university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 67
- It is often said that the subjects taught in schools are too academic in orientation and that it would be more useful for children to learn about practical matters such as home management work and intepersonal skills To what extent do you agree or disagre 73
- In natural scenic spots such as lakes mountains and beaches there is much litter or rubbish Why do people do that How to deal with it 94
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 56
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71232876712 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11591896921 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63698630137 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8865788524 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165085989292 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551036353336 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687337617895 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116991671389 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729036798243 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.