The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Evaluating factors when decide which career path or occupation to take plays an indispensable role. In terms of this, it is a prevalent belief that earning tremendous wage should be taken in to account initially. This essay will address why I don’t agree with this and cover its work force exploitation and the superficial vision of people considering being well-paid of the utmost importance.
On the one hand, prioritization of immense earnings from the first place will likely to make one suffer from being exploited. Given that higher income is associated with having to work much more laboriously than the people who do nine to five jobs. Furthermore, the lack of time to wind down, owning to the never-ending work, might exacerbate the weariness from the work place. Japan and Korea exemplify these with their foreign labors, who earn more there than in their hometown, being forced to labor until exhaustion day by day.
On the other hand, some only look at the tip of the iceberg and refer having high salary to a satisfying life. People deeming that way only notice the materialistic values at the time and ignore sentimentally unworthiness in long term. As I stated, the more an individual gets paid, the more time and effort must be spent. Albeit family could become affluent, fractures in the bond between members due to ages of separation may be inevitable. Cases of married couples cheating on each other when the other half chooses career over love and works nonstop, are prime examples.
To conclude, getting paid well leads to over-exploitation and manipulates people to see it as a worthy trade off. Therefore, I stand against the idea of making engaging income the paramount aspect when seek for jobs or commence a career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | trinhthanh1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-26 | kquynk | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Hypnogogic | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | iawg | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | Tran Thanh Binh | 67 | view |
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages then give your opinion 11
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps show the outskirts of the town of Fosbury in 1980 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98976109215 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74266857162 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665529010239 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0797487785 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.428571429 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111455406306 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359315741056 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476764232037 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662654294873 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239632335019 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.