In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing.
Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
It is a fact that people are expected to live longer on a worldwide scale, which raises alert for potential issues, but brings in benefits at the same time. Whilst I agree with the latter outcome, I opine that the negative side outweighs the opposite one.
The adverse ramifications of lifespan extension are seen in the detrimental health, the running-out resources and supplies. As more people live to old age, they are likely to suffer from acutely chronic diseases such as Alzheimer, the blurry vision,...given that the immune system deteriorates by the time. Consequently, not only their lives have high chances to be miserable but also, they could become the burden of the health care system and their families. The population ageing also leads to the more land and welfare occupied by people who are unable to contribute to the society, or the economy. By the time, the residential facilities, resources and merchandise will no longer meet the increasing demands.
Looking on a brighter side, the two major advantageous of lengthened lifetime are advices for the youth and the expansion of workforce. Aged people might pass down to the posterity wisdom from ages of living that can shorten the path to success of the younger generation. However, the day by day advance is turning some conventional wisdom into behind-the-time understandings. The partly conservative patriarchies in remote Asian areas exemplify that. From a capitalist perspective, less people passing away results in more human resources to be exploited. Despite being able to recruit more labors, the fact that a large number of them has already been over the working age and their states of health in this regard might cause the plans to backfire.
To conclude, after weighing both sides, I’m convinced that the disadvantages of living longer is outweighed by the advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 73 | view |
| 2024-05-05 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think this will change in the future Is it good for us to rely too much on computer 89
- Some believe that people today have no interest in maintaining the traditional culture of their country or region Other believe that it is still important to people that we preserve a traditional way of life Discuss both these views and give your own opin 89
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages then give your opinion 11
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 11
- In many country around the world life expectancy is increasing Discuss the advantages and disadvantages then give your opinion 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ses such as Alzheimer, the blurry vision,...given that the immune system deteriora...
^^
Line 3, column 715, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... no longer meet the increasing demands. Looking on a brighter side, the two majo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...fy that. From a capitalist perspective, less people passing away results in more hum...
^^^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e to recruit more labors, the fact that a large number of them has already been over the working ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19601328904 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91420648195 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634551495017 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7584152435 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0563941672467 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199275346196 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300639528098 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0481147830413 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356990777162 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.