The graphs below show the enrollments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period
Given are the line graphs comparing the number of foreign and indigenous students who studied in Australian universities over the decade of 2001-20010.
As can be seen from the graphs, there was a wide gap between the commencing and total quantity of students in a year. While the local student numbers was generally more than that of the foreigners, the overseas one experienced a higher growth rate over the period.
Specifically, in 2001, Australian universities attracted merely a negligible quantity of under 20,000 overseas students, whereas the indigenous numbers was nearly tenfold. However, the following years witnessed a dramatic rise of students choosing Australia as a destination, with the commencing numbers topped at 40,000 in 2010. In marked contrast, after reaching a peak of approximately 230,000, the local student enrollments fluctuated steadily at averagely 200,000.
When it comes to the total number of students in a year, both local and foreign enrollments share the same upward pattern. The quantity of students studying abroad was considered to experience a much higher growth rate compared to the locals when its figure rocketed to 80,000 at the end of the period, four times as high as the commencement. Regarding the local student enrollments, the data remained stable after peaking at 600,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | trikhung777 | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-08 | quytnee | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-08 | mrinal | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-05 | smiley | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | thaodim123 | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the percentage of US music album sales by genre in 2008 2009 and 2010 93
- The table shows the changes in modes of travel in a European country between 1995 and 2005 It also shows a projection to the year 2015 58
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compari 78
- Topic More and more people are migrating to cities in search of better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
Given are the line graphs comparing the number of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39423076923 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96426884626 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591346153846 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3040148102 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353966073143 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150551523871 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539631656549 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223207367516 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223168850132 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.