Topic:
The pictures show the changes of a park from 1980 to the present day.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The layout of a park now when compared to 1980 is illustrated in the given maps.
Overall, the park has undergone significant changes over time.
In the past, the park used to be locked. Therefore, no people were hanging around the park, and a lot of trees and flowers were grown there. At the present, it is opened freely for everyone. As a result, more people come to the park for entertainment as well as some outdoor activities. Some children go to the park to play sports, while some families have picnics where some tables and chairs are situated. The most noticeable change is the expansion of the road. Specifically, some trees are cut down to make way for the road, which now forms an intersection. Moreover, in 1980, four benches were located in the park, but now one is removed. Besides, colonies of flowers are no longer seen in the current park.
- Task 1 The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report f 78
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 78
- Topic The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross section of 100 000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period 1994 98 The second chart shows their destinations over the same period Write a report f 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 712.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65359477124 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56252497334 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633986928105 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2435897144 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.7272727273 112.824112599 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9090909091 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.23603664747 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143351946453 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560253903017 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210391105249 0.0843802449381 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994543161168 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133612731553 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.4 13.2329268293 56% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.