Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve, while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The tremendous affect of environmental pollution has engendered valid concern for people all over the world. Therefore, that leads to the ongoing argument that who would bear a responsibility for protecting environment, state official or ordinary citizens?. In my point of view, I believe that both of them should take plausible action to preventing the environmental degradation from being exacerbating.
On the one hand, it is government’s duty to preserving environment since they have more ability than ordinary citizens. Undeniably, the state has a lavish amount of funds to spend on some technology help minimize the environmental devastation. As annually nationals have to be taxed a relatively large amount of money to the government’s funds, state don have to worry about the deficit funds to pay the aforementioned devices. For instance, the installation of security cameras help authorities identify wrongdoers who illegally destruct trees in forests. What is more, government can impose environmental laws on both companies and national. That is to say, enterprises and ordinary citizens have to obey the law properly or else they will receive harsh punishment.
On the other hand, government intervention cannot be optimally effective if it does not accompany with citizens' actions. First and foremost, the contribution of ordinary citizens help the official state funds be sustainable and adequate. In fact, all the people, have to tax at least 5% of their earning to the state. Similarly, annually cooperation has to plough the part of its revenue into preserving environment. Secondly, the public can state their opinion and oppose the companies whose product do more harm than good for the nature. To be more specific, they can boycott those products and announce publicly all products’ environmental problems. As a result, the cooperation will change their mind and try to product eco-friendly goods.
All in all, I contend that both government and citizens should be in charge of taking some action to reverse the damage done to our planet. If they not cooperate together, most actions alone can be ineffective.
- Some people think that sports play an important role in the development of society Others think they are nothing more than a leisure activity Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve while others think that the government cannot solve these environmental problems unless individuals make some action Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f funds to spend on some technology help minimize the environmental devastation. ...
^^
Line 2, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sts. What is more, government can impose environmental laws on both companies and...
^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndly, the public can state their opinion and oppose the companies whose product d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, as to, at least, for instance, in fact, as a result, what is more, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39402985075 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13958904647 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.7094564102 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.388888889 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88888888889 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1461952609 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483739788047 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039808889478 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0990300327411 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319660290621 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.