In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what action can be taken to solve the problem?
There can be no doubt that the topic of public transport is one which deserves some analysis. It is the opinion of this writer that people like to take their own car and the public transportation system has become progressively unreliable are the causes of the high volume of traffic. However, measurements such as people trying to take public transportation can be undertaken to help tackle the problem.
The first cause is that people like to take their own car. People tend to purchase their own vehicles for better management of their own time when going anywhere. To exemplify, if they take their own car, they can go at any time and go where they want to go, this leads to traffic jams as a result. This is because the more people ride their own cars, the more traffic jams there are. Thus, people like to take their own car is the cause.
The second cause is that the public transportation system has become progressively unreliable. The situation of pickpocketing and jostling for seats is increasing on some public transports. For instance, on the bus, bad guys will easily approach their prey and will steal items when given the opportunity. This is because when on public transport, if there are more people in the bus, the more such situations will happen. Therefore, the public transportation system has become progressively unreliable.
To solve the problem, people should try to take public transportation. Although many situations happen on public transport, everyone should try to take care of their belongings. This is because, the less people use their own cars, the less congestion will be across countries. . Thus, people should try to take public transportation.
To conclude, it can be seen that the high volume of traffic is the outcome of people liking to take their own cars and the public transportation system becoming progressively unreliable. Yet, people trying to take public transportation can be adapted to solve the issue.
- Task 2 Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 11
- Education is not a luxury but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crimes To what extent do you agree 84
- Many people say that globalisation and the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the environment To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... their belongings. This is because, the less people use their own cars, the less con...
^^^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ss congestion will be across countries. . Thus, people should try to take public ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, no doubt, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03058103976 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88726916741 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418960244648 0.561755894193 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6936860072 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5789473684 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2105263158 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89473684211 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126518023319 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538834631339 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049007366862 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959001418891 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601672703446 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.94 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.