Task 2 Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Task 2. Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There is no doubt about the topic of using phones in a learning environment which deserves some analysis. There are many people who argue that children should be allowed to use phones in school, while others reject it. According to this writer's perspective, those who strongly support students use phones at school due to the fact of modernizing the educational system and saving environmental resources.
Phones should be prohibited as academic areas because they might be a toxic temptation to learners. Toxic temptation means the threats which distract students from gaining knowledge such as texts and online games. When in class, students have to ensure that they are paying the full concentration to teachers. If they are equipped with technology devices, they may have a tendency to focus too much on their phones. In that way, the more they use their phones for impractical purposes, the less qualified education they obtain. Therefore, this is the unfavorable side of using the phone during shoolday.
Standing at the other side of the view, there are two remarkable reasons: exaggerating a more modern education and reducing the exploitation of the environment. Firstly, in recent days, many developed countries so-called as the US, the UK have approached high-tech education. Phones which ought to be allowed at school will provide teachers with various methods to manage the homework and class activity in a more convenient way. Students these days provide a diverse range of papers which is considerably traffic to storage, but phones have arrived as the solutions. Therefore, schools should be convinced to permit phone use.
Moreover, most of us recognize that every year, the amount of wood exploited for tapes and study paper was dramatically enormous. Simultaneously, in order to meet the demand of study, environments experience destruction and excessive exploitation. By using phones at school, the devices are not only convenient and prevent the producer from detrimental to our environment. Furthermore, instead of investing a huge tuition on academic papers, parents will limit the amount of money they provide by purchasing the phone. In this context, phones have a multitasking role such as notebooks, mini boards, etc. Thus, schools should legalize using phones as school to gain more convenience.
In conclusion, although there are several disa

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-12 RTroMT 78 view
2023-08-03 ThoiPhong 84 view
2023-07-09 tieuquynh 84 view
2023-06-19 quang0612@1 61 view
2023-05-17 chesse 61 view
Essays by user John Ipin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ile others reject it. According to this writers perspective, those who strongly support...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'trafficked'.
Suggestion: trafficked
...e range of papers which is considerably traffic to storage, but phones have arrived as ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disa seems to be countable; consider using: 'several '.
Suggestion: several
...nce. In conclusion, although there are several disa
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35828877005 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89610087338 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7078041683 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332550692542 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100340631876 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102220680351 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166942573083 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959406519183 0.056905535591 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ile others reject it. According to this writers perspective, those who strongly support...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'trafficked'.
Suggestion: trafficked
...e range of papers which is considerably traffic to storage, but phones have arrived as ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disa seems to be countable; consider using: 'several '.
Suggestion: several
...nce. In conclusion, although there are several disa
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35828877005 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89610087338 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7078041683 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4285714286 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38095238095 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332550692542 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100340631876 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102220680351 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166942573083 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959406519183 0.056905535591 169% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.