The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
With the aid of technology advancing at the speed of light, it is now possible for society to communicate through social platforms instead of in-person interaction. This essay attempt to shed light on both the merits end demerits of this tendency before concluding that the latter is more significant.
On the one hand, using social networks to communicate is advantageous to some extent. Firstly, Social media platforms facilitate communications in modern times, as people now can globally connect with their peers, relatives, or others who share common interests. For example, Facebook is currently providing services to over 2.4 million users who can choose to connect or interact with anyone regardless of time and distance. Second, students around the world can have free access to online classes on social networks. It can be explained by the fact that study sessions in this day and age are frequently happening on social networking through live streaming services such as Zoom or Google Meet.
On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convinced that the positive aspects of this trend are eclipsed by its drawbacks. To begin with, people can easily get entangled and fall prey to online communication abuse such as cyberbullying or harassment. Social platforms can become a toxic environment where uses can verbally be assaulted since there are a few rules, most of which are spoken rules rather than established guidelines, that restrict hateful or abusive content, embarrassing pictures, disclosing personal information. Furthermore, the extensive use of social networks will diminish society's ability to interact face-to-face. In fact, young and reclusive people at this juncture prefer living in the virtual world on social sites to real-life relationships which lead to increased mental problems such as anxiety, stress, and loneliness as a result.
In conclusion, While it is irrefutable that getting in touch through online platforms has considerate benefits in some ways, I would contend that the downsides of this development are more significant than the benefits users could reap from those sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- Today TV channels provide man s sports show more than women s sports show Why Should TV channels give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 61
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 73
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What can be done to make people drink less 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'hosts'?
Suggestion: hosts
... Meet. On the other hand, there are a host of compelling reasons why I am convince...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37388724036 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92775650255 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626112759644 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8202814028 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.307692308 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156078530774 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062133280519 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846304249442 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0773686537682 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621768598979 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.