The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is an ongoing contentious debate over whether people will use social media to communicate with each other instead of going out and have a face-to-face meeting. In my opinion, I totally agree with this statement as the convenience of it and it helps fight the pandemic. However, it still has a disadvantage as it reduces human-to-human interaction.
To begin with, the advent of social networks provides us more convenience for information exchange and relationship maintenance, especially when long-distance is a matter. For example, students studying abroad enable to keep in touch with their families and friends on a daily basis without paying fees. Social media is also a powerful tool in marketing and business. In this digital age, companies not only keep the clients updated regarding the newly-released product but attract the new customer by running their campaigns on several online platforms such as Instagram, Facebook.
Moreover, due to an outburst of COVID-19 recently, many people are expected to work from home via a technology device like a laptop. As a result of it, social networking sites are so beneficial and help workers to complete the task without needing to.
By contrast, using social networking sites may be a counter-productive trend when the number of people relying on a virtual platform surge continuously. That situation can result in a decrease in the quality of interpersonal communication in society. Young people are getting used to virtual lives keep away from their parents, from the real world, and even get depressed. The consequences of over-reliance on social media which the young will have to suffer in the future, including a lack of socializing skills and losing a sense of interaction.
In conclusion, social media do harmful things to people when it is used wrongly and uncontrollably, nevertheless, it benefits greatly in a broad way of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- the graph below shows us consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone 73
- The pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people and the table shows where people born in these country lives
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- the graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a broad way" with adverb for "broad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ably, nevertheless, it benefits greatly in a broad way of life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26557377049 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17735199626 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626229508197 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4979332965 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209995113489 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628132485024 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655321514148 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114584042336 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549826891948 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.