People say that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this modern civilization, it is becoming increasingly easier for people to travel to different continents for various purposes. Going abroad to study is considered one of the most common aims. It is believed that this tendency is an advantage for nations. This essay will throw some light on the concept of its pros.
To commence, having students studying abroad benefits a country with a highly qualified workforce considerably. Many experts point out that those who go overseas to study have much more opportunities to cultivate themselves and broaden their horizons. With regards to this perspective, studying abroad will provide students a promising environment to go beyond their limits. Furthermore, being educated in the same nation with the same cultures and methods for a long time could stereotype people's minds and confide their creative competencies. Hence, after going abroad to study, these students can become better versions of themselves, gain a huge amount of immature knowledge and improve their sets of skills. This will definitely make them become great employees and contribute to helping the country flourish in several aspects.
Besides the above benefits, having students who study abroad is also a chance for cultural exchange. A student with all traditional qualities can effectively advertise the nation's beauty and mark the country's name on the global map. Furthermore, this student can also learn prominent qualities and achievements from the foreigner's country. This is widely proved in reality, especially for developing countries. Students from this nation often go out to learn about cutting-edge triumphs in the world and bring them back home with a strong will to strengthen their motherland.
I side with those who believe that country will gain great welfare when its students study in another nation. It not only forms a qualified workforce but also provides a good opportunity to exchange the culture. Consequently, I reckon that the government could channel resources into supporting students going overseas and enhance their competencies.
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 67
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 78
- The illustration shows information about how igloo is built from snow 64
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...qualities can effectively advertise the nations beauty and mark the countrys name on th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, as to, i reckon
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4613003096 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86847409975 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9053238836 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9444444444 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225299824076 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076370809325 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679007626284 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143372892682 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399667385624 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.